1855 treaty rights appeal raises questions

//1855 treaty rights appeal raises questions

1855 treaty rights appeal raises questions

Long-expected appeal to be heard September 19

Joe Fellegy asks some great questions to keep in mind about the attempt to expand 1855 Treaty rights. This case may have far more consequences than the Mille Lacs 1837 Treaty case. This decision could bring Mille Lacs style co-management to most of Northern Minnesota lakes.

PERM stands by all treaties with the tribes as they are written.

Gull Lake netting, 1855 treaty rights case

By Joe Fellegy Outdoor News August 16, 219

Several years have passed since the on-purpose violations of state laws by tribal gill-netters on Gull Lake and by tribal wild rice harvesters on nearby Hole-in-the-Day Lake. Along the way, three judges recused themselves. The cases were narrowed to one defendant, James Northrup.

Naturally, as intended by tribal attorneys and treaty-rights proponents, the found-guilty violator of state law claims 1855 treaty rights.

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has taken the case. Briefs have been filed. A three-judge panel has been appointed. Oral arguments will be heard Sept. 19.

The 1855 treaty ceded territory (land sold by the Chippewa to Uncle Sam) covers a huge area of Minnesota–from Mille Lacs to the Canadian border at one point. Think Aitkin lakes, Brainerd lakes, Grand Rapids, Park Rapids, Leech Lake, Big Winnibigoshish, and so much more. Possible impacts on state agencies? State resource-management authority? Our fishing and hunting communities?

Big stuff! Will Gov. Tim Walz, Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, and their DNR commissioner, Sara Strommen, do everything possible, legally, and politically to defend state and citizen interests? Attorney General Keith Ellison?

During the 2018 gubernatorial campaign, the Walz-Flanagan ticket pledged support for treaty rights. Hmm. Do they embrace the present quest by tribal interests and their attorneys to secure treaty rights across the vast 1855 ceded territory? Surely Minnesotans have a right to know. We’ll see.

And watch those power words like “treaty rights.” The era of Indian treaties ended in 1871. No treaty signers in 1837, 1855, or in other ancient years intended or envisioned any of the nutcake playing-out of treaty rights in the 21st century.

By |2019-08-20T10:52:50-05:00August 20th, 2019|Categories: Updates|Comments Off on 1855 treaty rights appeal raises questions

About the Author:

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.

This Is A Custom Widget

This Sliding Bar can be switched on or off in theme options, and can take any widget you throw at it or even fill it with your custom HTML Code. Its perfect for grabbing the attention of your viewers. Choose between 1, 2, 3 or 4 columns, set the background color, widget divider color, activate transparency, a top border or fully disable it on desktop and mobile.